On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Robert Zeigler <robe...@scazdl.org> wrote: > As a sort of nitpicky aside... does URLRewriterService have to be called > that? (Since we're still in new feature api-change mode, here... :). > What about just URLRewriter? Or URLRewriteHandler? Either of those seem to > gel a little more with existing naming (plus we then don't have the > redundancy of org.apache.tapestry5.*services*.URLRewriter*Service* (with * > added for emphasis).
I agree with you. As you're implementing this improvement, don't forget to update the documentation. ;) And thank you for implementing this, as I unfortunately cannot do this now. :) -- Thiago --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
