p.stavrini...@albourne.com wrote on 19/06/2009 17:00:14:
> could there be a naming problem in
> the constructor, shouldn't it read:
>
> public abstract class AbstractMyApplicationTest extends TapestryTest {
.....
> public *AbstractMyApplicationTest()* { //and not TestifyTest() ?
> super(SHARED_TESTER);
> }
...
Hi Peter,
Doh! Yes - I renamed the classes in the documentation and forgot to rename
the constructors... thanks for pointing that out.
I'll fix the documentation when I'm at home - it will be in the next
nightly build.
Paul
------------------
Paul Field
Research IT
Deutsche Bank
---
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying,
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional
EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
