Why invent the wheel again? I know and agree with you, that the chenillekit documentation is far away from being the big shot, but we invite everybody to contribute the project and share your time to create the real big one
with regards Sven Homburg Founder of the Chenille Kit Project http://www.chenillekit.org 2009/7/24 Ville Virtanen <ville.virta...@cerion.fi>: > > Hello everyone > > we have used FCK editor for quite some time now with file uploading > capabilities, and we needed the same functionality in several clients that > would have had to be kept separate due to licensing issues. Thus we agreed > to make it publicly available and so we have to keep only one copy up to > date. > > Currently the project lives in http://code.google.com/p/easyfckeditor/, but > I hope that we get Tapestry 360 site soon. Also, are there any maven > repositories that would accept packages without much fuss? The using would > be _much_ easier if the library was in a maven repository. > > Anyway, here is short description of the project (I hope that you enjoy, and > remember to give feedback.): > > Easy Fck Editor is open source extension to Tapestry 5 that uses (as the > name implies) FCK Editor under it's hood to deliver easy richtext editor > component with file upload capabilities. > The main focus is to do everything Tapestry 5 way: you can work entirely > with the provided (and excellent I might add) IoC as developers are used to. > Also the idea is to really provide such documentation that it is easy to > follow and understand. Easy Fck Editor aims to be simple to use and yet > provide good interface to aid in extending and securing Tapestry 5 based > rich editor needs. > Why? Doesn't ChenilleKit already have one? > > Easy Fck Editor project started because the editor in ChenilleKit couldn't > handle file uploads. Also I found that (at that time atleast) the > documentation was not on very good level. I also didn't need but a fraction > of what ChennilleKit provided. For me, I would be more merrier if there was > tiny bits that I can put together in the project pom, so that I could > "harvest" the libraries I need. This is also why I intent to package all > forthcoming Tapestry 5 extensions as separate jars where possible. (CKEditor > should follow shortly.) > > - Ville > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Announcment%3A-T5-FCK-editor-integration-library-tp24639378p24639378.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
