I've been having problems with FCKEditor (I haven't tried your library however) in that it caused problems with other Ajax components on the same page, for reasons I didn't have time and skill to diagnose. In my workshop, I'm starting to switch over to Yahoo's rich text editor instead.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Ville Virtanen<ville.virta...@cerion.fi> wrote: > > Hello everyone > > we have used FCK editor for quite some time now with file uploading > capabilities, and we needed the same functionality in several clients that > would have had to be kept separate due to licensing issues. Thus we agreed > to make it publicly available and so we have to keep only one copy up to > date. > > Currently the project lives in http://code.google.com/p/easyfckeditor/, but > I hope that we get Tapestry 360 site soon. Also, are there any maven > repositories that would accept packages without much fuss? The using would > be _much_ easier if the library was in a maven repository. I'm beginning to think that Tapestry 360 hosting code & issue's is not going to be sustainable. I want to shift the focus to being a build environment, Maven repository and a location for static web sites ... but code and issues I think will be better served on Google or on GitHub. > > Anyway, here is short description of the project (I hope that you enjoy, and > remember to give feedback.): > > Easy Fck Editor is open source extension to Tapestry 5 that uses (as the > name implies) FCK Editor under it's hood to deliver easy richtext editor > component with file upload capabilities. > The main focus is to do everything Tapestry 5 way: you can work entirely > with the provided (and excellent I might add) IoC as developers are used to. > Also the idea is to really provide such documentation that it is easy to > follow and understand. Easy Fck Editor aims to be simple to use and yet > provide good interface to aid in extending and securing Tapestry 5 based > rich editor needs. > Why? Doesn't ChenilleKit already have one? > > Easy Fck Editor project started because the editor in ChenilleKit couldn't > handle file uploads. Also I found that (at that time atleast) the > documentation was not on very good level. I also didn't need but a fraction > of what ChennilleKit provided. For me, I would be more merrier if there was > tiny bits that I can put together in the project pom, so that I could > "harvest" the libraries I need. This is also why I intent to package all > forthcoming Tapestry 5 extensions as separate jars where possible. (CKEditor > should follow shortly.) > > - Ville > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Announcment%3A-T5-FCK-editor-integration-library-tp24639378p24639378.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
