Just added a comment to TAP5-1408. Thanks. Benny
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Paul Stanton <p...@mapshed.com.au> wrote: > there is now (as of about 2 hrs ago) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1408 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1409 > > i'd prefer to use a built in tapestry component over another JS solution or > tapestry extension but as it stands the component is not suitable. i may try > and patch it .... > > interesting that tapx has a better datefield and is howards baby ... why > isn't this included in tapestry? licensing issues? > > p. > > > On 10/01/2011 8:00 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 18:58:47 -0200, Benny Law <benny.mk....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> However, I am beginning to lose heart when most people seem to have >>> simply given up on this component that is part of Tapestry. Is it really >>> "dead", or should I keep believing that DateField is still alive and will >>> continue to be improved upon? >>> >> >> Is there a JIRA about it? >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
