Hello everyone, I figured it's been a while since this topic has been brought up, so I'd like to come back to it again. I've finally managed to find some free time to play with my personal project "yay", which means I'll be doing a full rewrite. I'd like to hear what Tapestry-JPA users have to say about it in comparison to hibernate. For the past couple years, I've used Tapestry-Hibernate which has been really nice to work with, however I was recently turned on to Tapestry-JPA. I was told I wouldn't need to use value encoders with Tapestry-JPA, something I need to do all the time with Hibernate. This seemed pretty appealing, is there any other advantages I should know about? Thanks Guys.
-- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-jpa-5-3-vs-Tapestry-Hibernate-tp5566580p5566580.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
