+1 And +1 on hibernate 4.1+ ... 3.6 is buggy for us.
-- j On May 2, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Robert Zeigler <robert.zeig...@roxanemy.com> wrote: > If the only reason we're moving to 1.6 is to support a newer version of > hibernate in tapestry-hibernate, then I'm -1. I specifically know of a > corporation out there using tapestry that still uses java 1.5. Where there's > one, there are many. I suppose we could write them off as "stuck on tapestry > 5.3.x", but unless there's some major benefit to switching to 1.6... why > limit your potential customer base? > > While we're on the topic, I'm not particularly keen on tapestry-hibernate > attempting to force a particular hibernate version. I would much rather see > the hibernate dependency declared as "provided" (in maven parlance) and > specify a version range of compatible versions. > > Robert > > On May 2, 2012, at 5/21:05 AM , Kalle Korhonen wrote: > >> When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring >> JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 but >> the time for requiring 1.6 will come at some point. Not necessarily >> yet - we can likely work around this - but current Hibernate 4.x >> releases are built with 1.6. >> >> Kalle >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
