On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>wrote:
> I grasp them fully. > I stand by my opinion. > Now saying that, I am not saying Tapestry, or Tapestry-IOC sucks, I just > feel > Tapestry-IOC is unnecessary in the current technology landscape and > presents a barrier to > learning Tapestry. > Sure, it's possible I don't grasp it. If Tapestry IOC would fully implement the CDI spec, how would it be any different than any other CDI implementation? On the other hand, with the current CDI spec, how do you do distributed configuration? Kalle On May 15, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us > >wrote: > > > >> I think all of the CDI modules are basically a consumer layer so > Tapestry > >> pages/components/etc. can use CDI beans. > >> Usually, the use case is that the rest of the company is using CDI, and > >> the presentation layer (Tapestry) needs to use > >> some of that functionality. > >> > > > > It doesn't make it usual if that's the case in your company. > > > > This may be off topic, but in all honesty, after working with both CDI > and > >> Tapestry-IOC for two years now, > >> I would suggest phasing out Tapestry-IOC in favor of CDI. > >> Tapestry-IOC was the biggest obstacle for me learning Tapestry IMHO. > >> > > > > I just have to respond to that. I almost feel like you don't fully grasp > > either technology. To me, the greatest thing in CDI is the SPI layer. > It's > > an inclusive technology that encourage the CDI providers to innovate on > top > > of the CDI spec. In regards to Tapestry-IOC are you really sure you'd > like > > to do away with things like distributed configuration? To me, that's one > of > > the greatest things in Tapestry-IOC. What we want is tighter integration > > with CDI, not abandoning our IOC for some other implementation. > > > > Kalle > > > > > > > >> > >> On May 15, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:35:36 -0300, Nourredine Nourredine < > >> nourredin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>>> Atos is proud to announce the first release of Tapestry-cdi, part of > >>>> the got5[1] project. > >>> > >>> Yay! Thanks! > >>> > >>> One (maybe stupid) question: does it allow Tapestry services to be > >> provided as CDI beans, so they can have transaction handling or other > >> CDI-provided stuff, and still be injectable through Tapestry-IoC? That > >> would be the best of two worlds: Tapestry-IoC's easy declaration of > >> services with distributed configuration plus CDI-provided goodness. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
