Yeah thats what I was thinking about exactly. This way I can get rid of the
pesti constructor injection.

Does anyone knows if the autobuild / build process fails if a property
annotated @inject could not be injected? Kind of should be but I am quite
not sure... .


2013/9/23 Daniel Jue <teamp...@gmail.com>

> You'll probably find better examples online, but in my Test classes I
> usually have a method like this:
>
>
> private MyDAO<MyPojo,MyQueryObject> dao;
> @BeforeClass
> public void beforeClass() {
>
> // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
> System.out.println("MyDAOTest");
> Registry registry;
> RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
> builder.add(MyDAOModule.class);
> registry = builder.build();
> registry.performRegistryStartup();
> dao = registry.getService(MyDAO.class);
>
> }
>
> @Test
> public void f() {
> MyQueryObject q = new MyQueryObject();
> q.setAttribute("Martin");
> List<MyPojo> = dao.findByQuery(q);
> //assert something here
> }
>
>
> In MyDAOModule.class, you can set up your services to build via
> auto-binding, interface binding, or using a build method (public static
> MyDAO buildMyDAO() { ... }  )
> depending on your needs.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Martin Kersten <
> martin.kersten...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Is there anything to aid me with the usual service test. Currently I use
> > constructors to ease setup of the services. I will try out providing a
> test
> > module setting up the services and use tapestry IOC to create those.
> Should
> > have done so more early on, but wanted it simple first. But now when I
> have
> > three or four services to setup it becomes cumbersome.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/23 Martin Kersten <martin.kersten...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/23 Daniel Jue <teamp...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these
> > links
> > >> for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already).  Hope it helps.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/
> > >>
> > >> and then this one
> > >>
> > >> http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten <
> > >> martin.kersten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what
> > >> people
> > >> > nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing.
> > >> > Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb "Dmitry Gusev" <dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
> >:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for
> > (smoke)
> > >> > > integration testing my apps with URLs.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest (
> > >> > > https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859),
> > >> > > all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with
> > with
> > >> > this
> > >> > > patch applied:
> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Which is something you may already read while browsing the web.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Do you have any problems with this?
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten <
> > >> > > martin.kersten...@gmail.com
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any
> > >> please
> > >> > > > provide.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven
> stuff
> > >> is to
> > >> > > > slow for my program test cycle.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need
> > to
> > >> do
> > >> > > unit
> > >> > > > testing in java
> > >> > > > since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test
> may
> > be
> > >> > done
> > >> > > > in groovy
> > >> > > > but I am in doupt this would be such a gain.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using
> > >> only a
> > >> > > > fraction of the
> > >> > > > services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be
> > fairly
> > >> > fast
> > >> > > so
> > >> > > > it is ok
> > >> > > > (Hibernate takes way longer)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a
> presetup
> > >> in
> > >> > > > memory database (h2).
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the
> > >> dependency
> > >> > > > setup and stuff.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what
> speed
> > >> means
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > > if you
> > >> > > > use IOC, jetty or something else.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal
> > >> > experiences
> > >> > > > with
> > >> > > > the background of embedding either a web application server or
> an
> > >> IOC.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Cheers,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Martin (Kersten)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Dmitry Gusev
> > >> > >
> > >> > > AnjLab Team
> > >> > > http://anjlab.com
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to