Well I knew that with the constructor it is exactly what the internal
method createMethodInvocationPlan is doing. The sad thing is I have to
recreate it since its internal.
This ignore Inject works for me since I use autobild method of the regitry.
PS: Everyone is aware of the @Autobuild method? You can create a property
or parameter, annotate with it and Tapestry builds it on the fly using
autobuild.
Just like:
Constructor(@Autobuild ArrayList list1, @Autobuild ArrayList list2) {
assert list1 != list2;
}
Cheers,
Martin (Kersten)
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue <teamp...@gmail.com>
> You can still use a constructor/constructor injection when registering your
> service in your module, if you want. (In fact the auto binding looks for
> the constructor with the most parameters, if none are marked with @Inject.)
> Or, you can use Field Injection. Not sure if you can use both, probably
> not.
>
> If you have @Inject in your class X, and then register the class X in your
> module, Tapestry should throw an error if it can't find the class Y to
> inject into X.
>
> HOWEVER, if you are instantiating the class outside of the registry, the
> @Inject annotations are ignored. I know this because I have an old-school
> coworker who does not believe in Injection, and I have to make some
> services construct-able by him.. *le sigh*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Martin Kersten <
> martin.kersten...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Yeah thats what I was thinking about exactly. This way I can get rid of
> the
> > pesti constructor injection.
> >
> > Does anyone knows if the autobuild / build process fails if a property
> > annotated @inject could not be injected? Kind of should be but I am quite
> > not sure... .
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/23 Daniel Jue <teamp...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > You'll probably find better examples online, but in my Test classes I
> > > usually have a method like this:
> > >
> > >
> > > private MyDAO<MyPojo,MyQueryObject> dao;
> > > @BeforeClass
> > > public void beforeClass() {
> > >
> > > // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
> > > System.out.println("MyDAOTest");
> > > Registry registry;
> > > RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
> > > builder.add(MyDAOModule.class);
> > > registry = builder.build();
> > > registry.performRegistryStartup();
> > > dao = registry.getService(MyDAO.class);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > @Test
> > > public void f() {
> > > MyQueryObject q = new MyQueryObject();
> > > q.setAttribute("Martin");
> > > List<MyPojo> = dao.findByQuery(q);
> > > //assert something here
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > In MyDAOModule.class, you can set up your services to build via
> > > auto-binding, interface binding, or using a build method (public static
> > > MyDAO buildMyDAO() { ... } )
> > > depending on your needs.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Martin Kersten <
> > > martin.kersten...@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there anything to aid me with the usual service test. Currently I
> > use
> > > > constructors to ease setup of the services. I will try out providing
> a
> > > test
> > > > module setting up the services and use tapestry IOC to create those.
> > > Should
> > > > have done so more early on, but wanted it simple first. But now when
> I
> > > have
> > > > three or four services to setup it becomes cumbersome.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/23 Martin Kersten <martin.kersten...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/23 Daniel Jue <teamp...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > >> I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop
> these
> > > > links
> > > > >> for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it
> > helps.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> and then this one
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Dan
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten <
> > > > >> martin.kersten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder
> what
> > > > >> people
> > > > >> > nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing.
> > > > >> > Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb "Dmitry Gusev" <
> > dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for
> > > > (smoke)
> > > > >> > > integration testing my apps with URLs.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest (
> > > > >> > > https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859),
> > > > >> > > all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase
> > with
> > > > with
> > > > >> > this
> > > > >> > > patch applied:
> > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Which is something you may already read while browsing the
> web.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Do you have any problems with this?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten <
> > > > >> > > martin.kersten...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have
> > any
> > > > >> please
> > > > >> > > > provide.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven
> > > stuff
> > > > >> is to
> > > > >> > > > slow for my program test cycle.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I
> > need
> > > > to
> > > > >> do
> > > > >> > > unit
> > > > >> > > > testing in java
> > > > >> > > > since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance
> test
> > > may
> > > > be
> > > > >> > done
> > > > >> > > > in groovy
> > > > >> > > > but I am in doupt this would be such a gain.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly
> > using
> > > > >> only a
> > > > >> > > > fraction of the
> > > > >> > > > services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be
> > > > fairly
> > > > >> > fast
> > > > >> > > so
> > > > >> > > > it is ok
> > > > >> > > > (Hibernate takes way longer)
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a
> > > presetup
> > > > >> in
> > > > >> > > > memory database (h2).
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the
> > > > >> dependency
> > > > >> > > > setup and stuff.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what
> > > speed
> > > > >> means
> > > > >> > > and
> > > > >> > > > if you
> > > > >> > > > use IOC, jetty or something else.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just
> personal
> > > > >> > experiences
> > > > >> > > > with
> > > > >> > > > the background of embedding either a web application server
> or
> > > an
> > > > >> IOC.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Cheers,
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Martin (Kersten)
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > Dmitry Gusev
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > AnjLab Team
> > > > >> > > http://anjlab.com
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
