Consistent my ass.
On Feb 12, 2016 4:53 AM, "Emmanuel Sowah" <eso...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Basile,
>
> You must be foolish to call me a troll. You folks here at Tapestry fail to
> look beyond your small and narrow-minded community. You behave like a sect.
> Even your sect leader, Howard Lewis Ship, has recently been enlightened and
> have left Tapestry. You guys are now struggling with the pieces he left
> behind. You are just fools. It is really insane people are putting Tapestry
> into production. Just can't believe that. Because Tapestry is a dead
> framework walking.
> Guys, how do you justify that the founder of Tapestry, Howard Lewis Ship,
> is no more using it but using mainly Wicket in all his recent projects? You
> don't need an IQ of Einstein to understand why you also should stop using
> Tapestry. Be wise for once and do the right thing. Simply quit Tapestry!
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Basile Chandesris <ba...@free.fr> wrote:
>
> > https://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Trolls
> >
> >
> > Le 11/02/2016 21:25, JT a écrit :
> >
> >> No wonder itv sucks.
> >> On Dec 25, 2015 5:40 PM, "Kalle Korhonen" <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, T5.4 was still firmly headed by Howard. He created the first T5.4
> >>> branch over three years (see for example
> >>>
> http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2012/10/zeroing-in-on-tapestry-54.html)
> >>> and you can see the results of his mastermind everywhere in the T5.4
> >>> code.
> >>> I guess you could say it was the first release not finished by Howard.
> >>>
> >>> Kalle
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Alex Kotchnev <akoch...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Pretty epic, congrats to all who contributed and participated ! Most
> >>>> notably, this seems like the first Tapestry release that was not
> headed
> >>>>
> >>> by
> >>>
> >>>> Howard (of course, I don't have any stats to back that up).
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers - Alex K
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Bob Harner <bobhar...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Apache Tapestry developers are proud to announce that Tapestry
> 5.4,
> >>>>> a long-awaited major release, is now available for immediate
> download:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      http://tapestry.apache.org/download
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tapestry 5.4 represents a tremendous effort by a large number of
> >>>>> people, and includes almost 200 enhancements and over 300 bug fixes.
> >>>>> Full details are in the release notes, but here are a few highlights:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * A JavaScript abstraction layer that removes Tapestry's dependence
> >>>>> on Prototype and lets you swap in jQuery (or potentially other
> >>>>> JavaScript framewords) instead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * JavaScript modules based on RequireJS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * A new module, tapestry-webresources, which provides support for
> >>>>> automatically compiling CoffeeScript into JavaScript and Less into
> >>>>> CSS, and for minimizing CSS and JavaScript. And, best of all, this
> >>>>> processing takes place at runtime.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * Greatly improved asset caching based on the checksums of file
> >>>>> contents, to intelligently cache assets like images and CSS only
> >>>>> until their content changes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * The adoption of Bootstrap 3 CSS styling by default, with built-in
> >>>>> glyphicon support.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ... and many dozens of other significant changes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Despite all the changes, Tapestry 5.4 is still mostly a drop-in
> >>>>>
> >>>> replacement
> >>>>
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> 5.3 users, with the caveat that the adoption of Bootstrap 3 CSS may
> >>>>>
> >>>> require
> >>>>
> >>>>> some
> >>>>> CSS tweaks if you're not already using Bootstrap 3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please see https://tapestry.apache.org/release-notes-54.html for a
> >>>>>
> >>>> full
> >>>
> >>>> list of
> >>>>> changes and upgrade instructions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to