Yes, Thiago, that link is an evidence that Mr. Ship has abandoned his own Ship. He has let you all down. For those who are using Tapestry in production, pull them down ASAP and rewrite them in another best of breed framework like Wicket. That, Mr. Ship has left, is a clear evidence that Tapestry would die very soon. It was already a dying framework. Let's get the coffin ready to bury that losers framework. And as for you comment about Wicket, Thiago, Howard of course won't admit it publicly that he is using Wicket. I know a client where Howard used Wicket to implement their presentation layer. Contact me privately and I would share with you that Howard's secret.
Thiago, how many more weeks or months left for you also to abandon Tapestry? On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 07:53:04 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Guys, how do you justify that the founder of Tapestry, Howard Lewis Ship, >> is no more using it but using mainly Wicket in all his recent projects? >> > > I wish we had some high-quality trolls (the ones who make hard, insightful > questions) instead of this very low-quality one who keeps saying something > which is very easily proven wrong: > http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com.br/2015/08/seeking-new-clojure-engagment.html > . > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer > http://machina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
