I agree with Kalle and others, call it 6. Permanently locking the version
at 5 was always a bad idea, in my opinion.

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, 6:04 AM Andreas Ernst <a...@ae-online.de> wrote:

> Am 01.08.24 um 10:36 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
> > I would just call it Tapestry 6.x. It's not going to be compatible with
> any
> > previous version, or even with previous servlet containers. I well know
> the
> > history ("there will never be Tapesty 6") but past is past, there's no
> good
> > reason to avoid a new major, semantic version to indicate the difference.
> >
> > My two cents,
>
> +1
>
> I understand your arguments Thiago, this is Apache Tapestry 5, so the
> version must start with 5.
>
> I'm with Kalle to bring the version with Jakarta EE to version 6 as the
> changes are too extensive.
> Also to the outside.
>
> And we also have enough space in the 5 branch.
>
> Regards
> Andreas
> PS.: translated with DeepL
> --
> ae | Andreas Ernst | IT Spektrum
> Postfach 5, 65612 Beselich
> Schupbacher Str. 32, 65614 Beselich, Germany
> Tel: +49-6484-91002 Fax: +49-6484-91003
> a...@ae-online.de | www.ae-online.de
> www.tachyon-online.de
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to