-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aditi,
On 7/9/12 3:34 AM, Aditi Sinha wrote: > Thank you so much. We specified the BIO connector implementation > for HTTP and AJP protocol and the setup now supports IPv6. > > Is there any preference among the three connectors "BIO", "NIO" and > "APR"? How should one decide which connector to opt for? IMHO the NIO connector should be your best bet: it can serve the highest number of clients with the lowest overhead *and* does not require any native code to do it. So, it's more effective *and* simpler to deploy. Also, NIO (and APR) support the Comet protocol whereas BIO does not. You can certainly use NIO with AJP, though you may have to reconfigure your AJP bridge to get the benefit of additional AJP connections from the web proxy -- otherwise, you're just going to be using the standard N:N connection mapping between httpd and Tomcat, and won't get the benefit of being able to handle many (thousands?) connections from httpd to Tomcat with a smaller number of request processing threads in your <Executor>. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/8WmUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCTpgCeJy3yxj7b2GFh11y59lV2Xvuz wjMAn0/cvgbTk9L2iVbX/bvFpgFIJfCU =H/0+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
