there is a firewall between browser and apache httpd and i am not sure if there is a firewall between apache and tomcat (mostly no). But why would this firewall drop the connection ?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < smithh032...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 31, 2014 3:48 AM, "André Warnier" <a...@ice-sa.com> wrote: > > > > Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Caldarale, Charles R < > >> chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote: > >> > >>>> From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. [mailto:smithh032...@gmail.com] > >>>> Subject: Re: timeout > >>>>> > >>>>> - and if that is not the reason, then find the person responsible for > >>> > >>> the > >>>>> > >>>>> in-between equipment and ask them why their junk closes the > connection > >>>>> before your application has a chance to respond > >>>> > >>>> 'junk'? please clarify the usage of the word 'junk', here. :) > >>> > >>> I think the definition "something of poor quality" would fit in this > case, > >>> if the poor quality were a result of configuring equipment without > regard > >>> to the requirements of the network users. > >>> > >>> - Chuck > >>> > >> > >> understood, thanks Chuck. :) > >> > > > > Yes, what I meant precisely was thus : if after receiving numerous > complaints from your users and your boss that your application is > misbehaving; after an in-depth review of the Apache httpd and tomcat > on-line documentation; after a level-headed discussion of the issue with a > group of independent experts; after a thorough witnessed interview of a > significant sample of the users to ascertain their professional behaviour > in front of a browser and the absence of any problem with their mouse > buttons; after a careful and time-consuming examination of all the > evidence, including the access logs of both tomcat and httpd; if after all > that thus you would come to the inescapable conclusion that it is the > intermediate firewall/gateway that is the cause of all the trouble, then > when you talk to the people responsible for that equipment, the word that > might come to mind then, to qualify this equipment and its settings seen as > a whole, is "junk". > > > > Thank you for offering me the opportunity to clarify this section of my > previous post. > > > > You're welcome, the pleasure was [almost] all mine, and thank you for the > clarification. :-) > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > -- *Thanks & Regards Vickyb*
