Thank you. Do we just rename the existing ROOT to something else so the admin stuff is available? The path="" was appealing as we want this existing large application to be available as "/". Is renaming ROOT a better way of achieving this?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 3:50 PM Chuck Caldarale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jun 19, 2024, at 14:42, Stephen Tenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > You asked why path="" instead of path="foo" in context at server.xml? > > > > That was our attempt to mount this application at "/" instead of at > "/foo" > > which is a requirement here. > > > Just deploy the application as ROOT (case matters) rather than foo. > > - Chuck > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
