On 2/14/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David,
David Smith wrote:
> Seems like these should be preserved instead of decoded when the output
> is x/html.
If the &'s were preserved, then how would you actually emit an '&'
character?
&#uuuu;
the & is not xml its html.
Btw, & isn't allowed in html as well, for example in links.
regards
Leon
I think that the OP and the author of the rant against JSPXs are both
attempting to ignore the fact that a JSPX is not simple another XML
document. It's an XML document that generates another XML document.
Given that, special attention ought to be paid to XML entities such as
these.
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF02DO9CaO5/Lv0PARAr0WAJ4m+3gItG3DkUJNK/EwRvL9rjIt6ACfZHnD
86OlEMvUBT45QCq068PVLpo=
=1uxt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
