valves are configured for the container as seen here for RequestDumperValve
just below top-level Catalina
<BR>
<Valve className="org.apache.catalina.valves.RequestDumperValve"/><BR>
info available at<BR>
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/valve.html<BR>
HTH<BR>
Martin<BR>
______________________________________________ <BR>
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business
of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not
endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does
not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:24:44 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [a little OT] Can I get Millisecond precision in Access Logs?
>
> Ok, so I see that will have to roll my own PreciseAccessLogValve. So how do
> I integrate with Tomcat? Do i just write my code, jar it and place in the
> Tomcat's common/lib, and simply reference the classname like I do the
> built-in accesslogvalve?
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > David Fisher wrote:
> > > Mark,
> > >
> > > Interesting but shouldn't the getDate method be slightly different:
> > >
> > > if ((systime - currentDate.getTime()) > 1000) {
> > >
> > > In this line if currentDate is at millisecond 900 then the next second
> > > starts with the millisec and that is 100 ms later.
> > >
> > > long cachedtime = currentDate.getTime();
> > > if ((systime - cachedtime > 999 - cachedtime%1000) {
> > >
> > > Yes, I know it is a quibble about what is probably "fuzzy" logic. But
> > > I'm just a guy who learned to typeset using integers in ebcdic at 300
> > > dpi in Fortran and IBM Sys 370 Assembler and this is a classic "next
> > > pixel" problem with proportional width characters at a small font size.
> >
> > You are right this isn't perfect. I'd need to do some performance tests so
> > see how much slower the more correct code is. To be perfectly honest, I can
> > live with the current implementation and don't feel the urge to scratch
> > this particular itch.
> >
> > Of course, that shoudn't stop anyone else who fancies taking a look at
> > this. Patches that improve the implementation without adding much (actually
> > any in this case) overhead welcome.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
_________________________________________________________________
See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of your
life.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/
