-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 sinoea,
sinoea kaabi wrote: > The static methods are not thread-safe you say! No, your static methods are perfectly threadsafe. Johnny is just getting itchy because it's not what he'd do. You aren't using any class-level members in your static methods so you should be fine. > Or in fact, you must be right, should I declare them synchronized? No! This will limit your code to serialized database access, in which case you are really only allowing a single connection to be used at a time. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjSejEACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDPUACggEWdUUKYajU1uRr8YgO/u+2J //gAoLGPZqMvl6WDyEKQWnNkYpV2Tdrp =ewSc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
