Thanks much for the responses. I understand.

It makes sense to use HttpServletRequestWrapper, but there are no methods in
HttpServletRequestWrapper or HttpServletRequest that initiates the sending
of the response back to the client. So, by subclassing HttpServletRequest
there doesn't appear to be any way to suppress the sending on the response
back to the client (until I've completed processing).

What I would like to do is to prevent the response from being sent back to
the client until my filter has completed it's processing (and this is after
my filter delegates the doFilter() call to the other filters).

Mike


Pid-2 wrote:
> 
> André Warnier wrote:
>> slioch wrote:
>> [...]
>> I'll risk an explanation here..
>> 
>> I think maybe the issue is a misunderstanding of how a servlet filter
>> works.  It took me a while too, but I think I've got it in the end.
>> Sorry if this is level 101, that's my own level.
>> 
>> What was confusing to me at first, is that this is different from, for
>> instance, Apache input and output filters.  There there is a clear
>> distinction between an input filter, which sees all the data on the way
>> in to the application, and an output filter, which sees all the data
>> that the application produces, before it goes out to the browser.  An
>> input filter and and output filter are two separate pieces of code, and
>> you can install them independently.
>> 
>> In the Java servlet view of things, a filter is a "wrapper", within
>> which the other filters and the webapp run.
>> It's like an onion : your filter is the outer layer, within which there
>> are possibly further layers (other filters), and at the center is the
>> webapp.  When your filter calls doFilter(), it executes all its inner
>> layers in one go.  The bummer is that, unless you take pains to change
>> that, each of these layers has a direct access to the output buffers,
>> which live outside the onion. So unless you prevent them from doing
>> that, they will start putting bytes there, and by the time your
>> doFilter() returns, it's too late to change that.
>> 
>> When you execute doFilter(), in fact you execute, at that point, all the
>> further filters that are in the chain, and the webapp at the deepest
>> level.  If any of these starts sending output, then by the time the
>> doFilter() returns, that output is already "past" your filter, and there
>> is nothing you can do anymore to modify it.
>> 
>> If you want something else to happen, then you have to do something like
>> this :
>> - in your filter, subclass the HttpRequest, say as "myHttpRequest".  In
>> this subclass, redefine the methods that the underlying filters and
>> webapp will (presumably) use to send output to the buffer.  In these
>> redefined methods, you can then do whatever you want to transform what
>> the application sends out via these methods.
>> - then, instead of passing the original HttpRequest to the doFilter(),
>> pass your own myHttpRequest instance of it.
> 
> Close enough; the spec has some stuff that covers this type of problem,
> so I'd recommend investigating:
> 
>  javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper
>  javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponseWrapper (hereafter HSRsW)
> 
> Using the latter should allow you to modify the appropriate header.
> 
>  HSRsW wrappedHres = new HttpServletResponseWrapper(hres);
>  chain.doFilter(hreq, wrappedHres);
> 
> Where your HSRsW contains appropriate code to modify the header, perhaps
> in the construction phase.
> 
> p
> 
> 
>> This way, whenever the application "thinks" it is just using the (say)
>> HttpRequest.setHeader() method, it is in fact using *your*
>> myHttpRequest.setHeader() method, in which you can catch and "pervert"
>> whatever you want, before passing it on to the "real"
>> HttpRequest.setHeader() method.
>> 
>> The point is, if you let any underlying (from the point of your filter)
>> other filter or webapp call i.e. the original setHeader(), then that's
>> it : that line of output is now already in the HTTP output buffer queue,
>> and by the time your doFilter() returns, it no longer can "claw it back".
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/setHeader-after-DoFilter-delegation-in-filter--tp19862960p19925786.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to