-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris,
Chris Wareham wrote: > By the way, if it's not static data your caching, > how's your messaging system? Without one how are you going to maintain > the integrity of your caches? Even with one, can you tolerate a race > condition between the data being modified in the database and the > notifications causing all your caches to be updated? Er... write-through cache? Presumably, Leon is talking about a one-box wonder. Before everyone starts yelling about how stupid everyone else's ideas are, maybe we should just let this one go in the interests of civility. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl6A+UACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCWdACdH0d9og7mrxwSzfZyn5hmzzo+ 9AsAoKmNOfAlMiX6jkRcbUof72goMM9T =nOJX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
