Chris, my experience with those scanners (slowest on top):
- Symantec (Norton) - Kaspersky - McAffee However, those "experiences" are based on workstations only. I do know that at least some of those scanners do have different enterprise soltutions. However, I guess "experiences" may vary, so you have to measure. Measuring only works in a defined environment, so that even if there /were/ any benchmarks, they might not mirror the situation within /your/ environment. Therefore, IMHO, if Linux is not an option for some weird political reason, I'd ask those AV-vendors to get me a version which I could test for a month. After 3 months of tests you should know which scanner is best for your requirements. Coming back to the OP's problem: For a quick solution /knowing/ that my actual scanner is the bottleneck, I definately would give some different scanners a try and see if that helps. Cheers Gregor -- just because your paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you... gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 @ http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
