-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pieroxy,
On 11/11/2009 12:04 PM, pieroxy wrote: > There is no reason it would hurt performance (and why are you mentioning > sleeping threads?). Well, if bytes are available for sending faster than the bandwidth-limiter is willing to go, then.. you ... have ... to .... wait. How else to wait other than sleeping your thread? Do-nothing loop? > In any case, you need to count the number of bytes transferred, and the > filter would do just that. Then you probably need to persists this > information along with the logged in user somewhere. Logging is not sufficient. The OP wants to /limit the bandwidth/ of the connection, not just do accounting on it. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkr7MAkACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDE2ACeJHsAiJ1V/KHnImljbD5+7mLe KzgAn0pUadZI4h6SautEJslV0BUJvUGf =z5Hk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
