no, that's totally public *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/3/4 James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> > Something is not right here. It is exclusive to Apache people or something? > > Not Found > > The requested URL > > /repos/asf/tomee/karafee/trunk/openejb-core-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/osgi/impl/Deployer.javaif > was not found on this server. > ------------------------------ > Apache/2.2.17 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.17 OpenSSL/1.0.0g DAV/2 mod_wsgi/3.1 > Python/2.7.2 SVN/1.7.5 Server at svn.apache.org Port 80 > > > On 4 March 2013 08:56, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > now i have a computer i can give you some more info ;) > > > > here > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/karafee/trunk/openejb-core-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/osgi/impl/Deployer.javaif > > you scroll down a bit you'll find OSGiDeploymentLoader > > where the logic you want to add could be added > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/3/4 Katya Todorova <katya.k.todor...@gmail.com> > > > > > Thank you for sharing your concerns. I guess the other option is to > > > extend OpenEJB container in order to support jar as deployment > > > archive. > > > > > > Kind regards., > > > Katya > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The technical issues with OSGi are multiple and often app servers > hide > > it > > > > to the users. The real gain of OSGi is often not usable with modern > > > > libraries. That s why we d prefer to not get too much osgi in tomee > > > itself > > > > Le 1 mars 2013 18:00, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032...@gmail.com > > > > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Basically tomee/openejb are jee anf not osgi but all osgi tweaks > > > should > > > >> go > > > >> > in karafee. > > > >> > > > > >> > Just to explain the idea it would be a pain if tomee starts to be > > > >> > complicated/not straight fwd because if osgi. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> Interesting. you can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Glassfish > is > > > >> OSGI'ish, and honestly, I did not like the startup time of > > > >> Glassfish(3.1.2.2, last version I used) and I found deployment of > > > 'updated' > > > >> EJBs was NOT reliable unless I undeployed entire app and redeployed > > (via > > > >> NetBeans, of course!). > > > >> > > > >> I love the startup time of TomEE!! wow, i can deploy hot/quick fixes > > > much > > > >> quicker via TomEE+, and on the latest/newest 'production' server, > > TomEE > > > >> starts the app in 10 to 15 seconds, maybe quicker than that, haven't > > > >> checked the speed of TomEE+ startup time (recently). > > > >> > > > >> Glassfish (on older production server) took 'minutes' to startup > > and/or > > > to > > > >> deploy hot/quick fixes. :( > > > >> > > > > > >
