Well spotted, that works.

On 4 March 2013 10:00, Katya Todorova <katya.k.todor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's a redundant "if" in the end of the link, the following is
> accessible:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/karafee/trunk/openejb-core-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/osgi/impl/Deployer.java
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > no, that's totally public
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/4 James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Something is not right here. It is exclusive to Apache people or
> something?
> >>
> >> Not Found
> >>
> >> The requested URL
> >>
> >>
> /repos/asf/tomee/karafee/trunk/openejb-core-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/osgi/impl/Deployer.javaif
> >> was not found on this server.
> >> ------------------------------
> >> Apache/2.2.17 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.17 OpenSSL/1.0.0g DAV/2 mod_wsgi/3.1
> >> Python/2.7.2 SVN/1.7.5 Server at svn.apache.org Port 80
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4 March 2013 08:56, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > now i have a computer i can give you some more info ;)
> >> >
> >> > here
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/karafee/trunk/openejb-core-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/osgi/impl/Deployer.javaif
> >> > you scroll down a bit you'll find OSGiDeploymentLoader
> >> > where the logic you want to add could be added
> >> >
> >> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2013/3/4 Katya Todorova <katya.k.todor...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > Thank you for sharing your concerns. I guess the other option is to
> >> > > extend OpenEJB container in order to support jar as deployment
> >> > > archive.
> >> > >
> >> > > Kind regards.,
> >> > > Katya
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > The technical issues with OSGi are multiple and often app servers
> >> hide
> >> > it
> >> > > > to the users. The real gain of OSGi is often not usable with
> modern
> >> > > > libraries. That s why we d prefer to not get too much osgi in
> tomee
> >> > > itself
> >> > > > Le 1 mars 2013 18:00, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <
> smithh032...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > a
> >> > > > écrit :
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Basically tomee/openejb are jee anf not osgi but all osgi
> tweaks
> >> > > should
> >> > > >> go
> >> > > >> > in karafee.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Just to explain the idea it would be a pain if tomee starts to
> be
> >> > > >> > complicated/not straight fwd because if osgi.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Interesting. you can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think
> Glassfish
> >> is
> >> > > >> OSGI'ish, and honestly, I did not like the startup time of
> >> > > >> Glassfish(3.1.2.2, last version I used) and I found deployment of
> >> > > 'updated'
> >> > > >> EJBs was NOT reliable unless I undeployed entire app and
> redeployed
> >> > (via
> >> > > >> NetBeans, of course!).
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I love the startup time of TomEE!! wow, i can deploy hot/quick
> fixes
> >> > > much
> >> > > >> quicker via TomEE+, and on the latest/newest 'production' server,
> >> > TomEE
> >> > > >> starts the app in 10 to 15 seconds, maybe quicker than that,
> haven't
> >> > > >> checked the speed of TomEE+ startup time (recently).
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Glassfish (on older production server) took 'minutes' to startup
> >> > and/or
> >> > > to
> >> > > >> deploy hot/quick fixes. :(
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to