In my opinion, that's really exciting! I hadn't heard of Meecrowave before this email. Congratulations for the efforts.
Meecrowave OAuth2 sounds insanely helpful too -- and a lot simpler to configure than JBoss KeyCloak, based on what I saw the last time I looked at it. Should Meecrowave work out of the box with Bean Validation and Jackson (with the JAX-RS extension) if they are included in the classpath? Additionally, I didn't see any mention of DataSource configurations in the documentation, but I suppose it should fine because of TomEE embedded, is that right? Thanks! Regards, Danilo Cominotti Marques On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > did a few on my blog > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/#/search;query=meecrowave and there > is > the website openwebbeans.apache.org/meecrowave > > strictly speaking it is mainly inspired from recent tomee embedded changes > but simplifying it a lot and making the stack consistent/uniform (we can't > at tomee cause of all possibilities we have). It is limiting it to > cdi+jaxrs (not even jpa). Opens a lot of doors nowaday even you can feel > frustrated for JPA backends. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-02-23 22:25 GMT+01:00 hwaastad <he...@waastad.org>: > > > Meecrowave........ > > > > Is that a new kid on the block? ;-) > > > > Seriously, seems cool, any blog articles yet? > > > > /hw > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440. > > n4.nabble.com/7-0-3-release-tp4681145p4681150.html > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
