hmm, it is on the website:

[image: Images intégrées 1]

will fix the tag now


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-03-22 21:15 GMT+01:00 Danilo Cominotti Marques <dcominot...@gmail.com>:

> OK, it seemed confusing because the release doesn't show up on the website
> nor on the Releases section from GitHub. Thanks for the update.
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > 2017-03-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 Danilo Cominotti Marques <
> dcominot...@gmail.com
> > >:
> >
> > > Thanks for the previous answers. Regarding meecrowave, I think it
> really
> > > needs some extra basic info in the quickstart on how to get up and
> > running
> > > with Maven ASAP, because I just couldn't do it. As for TomEE 7.0.3, is
> > > there any news? It seems the code from the repository is on the 7.0.4
> > cycle
> > > already but there hasn't been a 7.0.3 release yet.
> > >
> > >
> > it is on central
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2017-02-24 8:50 GMT+01:00 Danilo Cominotti Marques <
> > > dcominot...@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > >
> > > > Well this should move to openwebbeans@ list (meecrowave is a
> > subproject
> > > of
> > > > openwebbeans not tomee) ;)
> > > >
> > > > In my opinion, that's really exciting! I hadn't heard of Meecrowave
> > > before
> > > > > this email. Congratulations for the efforts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Meecrowave OAuth2 sounds insanely helpful too -- and a lot simpler
> to
> > > > > configure than JBoss KeyCloak, based on what I saw the last time I
> > > looked
> > > > > at it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Should Meecrowave work out of the box with Bean Validation and
> > Jackson
> > > > > (with the JAX-RS extension) if they are included in the classpath?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Not by default since it is not cdi code but it is not that hard:
> > > >
> > > > - for jackson you will ikely need to deactivate the default json
> > provider
> > > > (through the cli or setter if you code the main) setting
> > > > jaxrs-default-provider to org.apache.johnzon.jaxrs.JsrProvider only
> > > > probably and produce the jackson one, for instance:
> > > >
> > > > @Produces
> > > > public JacksonJsonProvider jackson() {
> > > >     return new JacksonJsonProvider();
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is likely the hardest since jackson is not yet very jaxrs 2
> > friendly
> > > > (its @Consumes/@Produces) so you need to switch off defaults
> providers
> > > > which have a higher priority by default but it is not that hard.
> > > >
> > > > - for bean validation, once added to the classpath:
> > > >
> > > > @Produces
> > > > public BeanValidationFeature bvalIntegration() {
> > > >     return new BeanValidationFeature();
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > That's it :).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Additionally, I didn't see any mention of DataSource configurations
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > documentation, but I suppose it should fine because of TomEE
> > embedded,
> > > is
> > > > > that right?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Meecrowave is just cdi+jaxrs. It has a few extensions for jpa but it
> is
> > > > *extensions*. Doc is on
> > > > http://openwebbeans.apache.org/meecrowave/meecrowave-jpa/index.html.
> > You
> > > > love it or hate it cause it makes the resources part of the app (vs
> > > managed
> > > > by the container for tomee case for instance). Both have pros and
> cons
> > > and
> > > > I have to admit depending the app both make sense (no silver bullet
> > ;)).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Danilo Cominotti Marques
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > did a few on my blog
> > > > > > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/#/search;query=meecrowave
> and
> > > > there
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > the website openwebbeans.apache.org/meecrowave
> > > > > >
> > > > > > strictly speaking it is mainly inspired from recent tomee
> embedded
> > > > > changes
> > > > > > but simplifying it a lot and making the stack consistent/uniform
> > (we
> > > > > can't
> > > > > > at tomee cause of all possibilities we have). It is limiting it
> to
> > > > > > cdi+jaxrs (not even jpa). Opens a lot of doors nowaday even you
> can
> > > > feel
> > > > > > frustrated for JPA backends.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE
> > Factory
> > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2017-02-23 22:25 GMT+01:00 hwaastad <he...@waastad.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Meecrowave........
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is that a new kid on the block?  ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Seriously, seems cool, any blog articles yet?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > /hw
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.
> > > > > > > n4.nabble.com/7-0-3-release-tp4681145p4681150.html
> > > > > > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to