...to tell you the truth, it impressed the developers but I didn't get that feeling from the top brass. I am pretty sure we will move towards Seam/JSF/Facelets (we have a presentation on that tech next week given by another developer) since it is "standard".
Has anyone here worked with the Seam tech? All the examples I have seen (including Facelets) is nothing but tag soup with scriptlets in the page (albeit small). The configuration for a Seam project seems like a pain and was also told that the JSF/Seam/Faclets jsp pages can be previewed in a browser (something I thought was so clever about Wicket html pages...and I was under the impression that Wicket was the only tech that allowed true separation of concerns; allowing the web designer to work independenly of the programmer with no duplication of work between the two). Maybe I'm blind to Wicket and I'm overlooking Seam and the techs related to it? I've worked with Freemarker and Struts before and Wicket feels like "natural" web development. I thought I covered all the great concepts about Wicket: Ajax, Templating, Inheritance, Reusable Components, OO Concepts…etc… Bah…just venting. I’m going to have to win the votes of the developers. I’ll keep everyone posted. Thanks amigos! - rm3 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Presented-Wicket-to-my-Company...-tf4532130.html#a12933638 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
