sounds like what you should do is take your manager out for drinks :) -igor
On 9/27/07, robert.mcguinness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...to tell you the truth, it impressed the developers but I didn't get > that > feeling from the top brass. I am pretty sure we will move towards > Seam/JSF/Facelets (we have a presentation on that tech next week given by > another developer) since it is "standard". > > Has anyone here worked with the Seam tech? All the examples I have seen > (including Facelets) is nothing but tag soup with scriptlets in the page > (albeit small). The configuration for a Seam project seems like a pain > and > was also told that the JSF/Seam/Faclets jsp pages can be previewed in a > browser (something I thought was so clever about Wicket html pages...and I > was under the impression that Wicket was the only tech that allowed true > separation of concerns; allowing the web designer to work independenly of > the programmer with no duplication of work between the two). Maybe I'm > blind to Wicket and I'm overlooking Seam and the techs related to it? > > I've worked with Freemarker and Struts before and Wicket feels like > "natural" web development. I thought I covered all the great concepts > about > Wicket: Ajax, Templating, Inheritance, Reusable Components, OO > Concepts…etc… > > Bah…just venting. I'm going to have to win the votes of the developers. > I'll keep everyone posted. Thanks amigos! > > - rm3 > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Presented-Wicket-to-my-Company...-tf4532130.html#a12933638 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
