Just search around the mailing list, Vegas.com did an evaluation of jsf vs wicket, and the results were quite interesting.
-Matej On 9/28/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i don't know if it helps, but my funded startup (austin ventures) is using > wicket, as well as people at well known companies like Joost and IBM. i've > had 3 consulting offers including one from a major company in just the last > week. so wicket is not untested technology. and it's definitely taking > off. and yes, it does solve a lot of the problems you're talking about > which other frameworks do not address. but it takes time to affect change, > particularly in management (and for good reasons). but that said, unless > you're developing applications without a lot of complexity (where templating > plus a little logic is all you need), your company is probably making a > mistake. you might have them read the second section of this article: > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2176557,00.asp > > and no, i don't know anyone at that company. > > > robert.mcguinness wrote: > > > > ...to tell you the truth, it impressed the developers but I didn't get > > that feeling from the top brass. I am pretty sure we will move towards > > Seam/JSF/Facelets (we have a presentation on that tech next week given by > > another developer) since it is "standard". > > > > Has anyone here worked with the Seam tech? All the examples I have seen > > (including Facelets) is nothing but tag soup with scriptlets in the page > > (albeit small). The configuration for a Seam project seems like a pain > > and was also told that the JSF/Seam/Faclets jsp pages can be previewed in > > a browser (something I thought was so clever about Wicket html pages...and > > I was under the impression that Wicket was the only tech that allowed true > > separation of concerns; allowing the web designer to work independenly of > > the programmer with no duplication of work between the two). Maybe I'm > > blind to Wicket and I'm overlooking Seam and the techs related to it? > > > > I've worked with Freemarker and Struts before and Wicket feels like > > "natural" web development. I thought I covered all the great concepts > > about Wicket: Ajax, Templating, Inheritance, Reusable Components, OO > > Concepts…etc… > > > > Bah…just venting. I'm going to have to win the votes of the developers. > > I'll keep everyone posted. Thanks amigos! > > > > - rm3 > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Presented-Wicket-to-my-Company...-tf4532130.html#a12935999 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
