Okay everyone, after re-reading my posts on this thread, I need to take a minute and apologize for my previous comments. They came off very argumentative and that's not what I intended.
I was *so* excited to share this idea and I was kind of expecting everyone's response to be more like "WOW, this is a *fabulous* idea". =) I really appreciate the comments, and realize it's a bigger topic than I originally thought. I think I'm going to take some time to think this over and maybe write a blog or two on the subject. My original goal was to see something change with Wicket's core, but maybe all that's needed is a wiki article/cookbook for users to walk through. Thanks again, and I'm genuinely sorry if I pissed anyone off. Really! On Jan 27, 2008 12:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how would specific components opt out? if i have a textarea i am going > to add tinymce behavior to, i dont want it to be validated via ajax. > > i often have validators that hit the database to check for uniquness, > etc. since every time i press a key the entire form is reprocessed, it > will add quiet a bit of overhead both to my database and to the > response time of the ajax - because optimally if the field is > standalone only that one field would be validated... > > -igor > > > On Jan 27, 2008 8:04 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > out of curiosity, would there be any interest in shipping Wicket with > > Ajax form validation turned on *by default* instead of developers > > manually adding the AjaxFormValidatingBehavior? Are there any > > drawbacks to having this be the default behavior? > > > > > > On Jan 27, 2008 9:00 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/wicket_client_side_validation > > > > > > I've spent the past couple weeks investigating Wicket's support for > > > client side validation. IMO, using Ajax for validation in Wicket is > > > really amazing. Lots of folks are touting "javascript validation" > > > right now, but I think Wicket has a definite advantage because the > > > Ajax validation *reuses* all of your server side validation for free! > > > This might be worth mentioning on the feature list somewhere and I'd > > > be interested in any comments. > > > > > > Ryan > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
