the order in which you add components in java seldom matters, the true
ordering is defined by markup.
-igor
On Jan 30, 2008 9:34 PM, kenixwong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thanks for reply in a short time, igor
>
> But here , i found the problem,...
>
> In my page constructor, i defined the component modalWindow, feedbackPanel,
> a form in sequence. So, in common sense, it will call the modalWindow ( i
> wish to auto pop up once the page is load ) first follow by the other. The
> problem i faced here is the modal window run at the end once the page is
> finish loaded. Cnan i know the reason here... ?
>
> my page constructor :
>
> public LineChart() {
> /// modal window use panel..
> add(modalWindow);
>
> // to auto pop up the modal window.
> ajaxLink = new AjaxLink("cancelReportModalLink"){
> @Override
> public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
> cancelReportModal.show(target);
> }
> };
> add(ajaxLink);
>
> // Fire the ajaxLink onclick function
> getBodyContainer().addOnLoadModifier(new ClickOnceOnLoadModel( ajaxLink
> ), null );
>
> add(feedback);
> add(new LineChartForm("LineChartForm"));
> }
>
>
> private class LineChartForm extends Form {
> // execute query
> // result as in JFreeChart
> }
>
>
> From the above partial code, the modal window should call then only form.
> Can anyone give the explanation ?
>
>
> and is it possible i stop the form process if the user click the cancel
> button from the modal window ?
>
>
> thanks in advance
>
>
>
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
> >
> > it doesnt have anything to do with server side threading, but with how
> > browser processes html and javascript.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On Jan 30, 2008 9:16 PM, kenixwong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> for the above case, for example... my page constructor: i add the
> >> component
> >> ( modal window, feedBackPanel, form ) . Once i load the page, why the
> >> modal
> >> window will only display when the page is finish loaded. Is that the
> >> wicket
> >> had default set the main thread for the form component?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/is-there-wicket-had-per-defined-the-Thread-for-the-form-component-tp15198385p15198385.html
> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/is-there-wicket-had-per-defined-the-Thread-for-the-form-component-tp15198385p15198494.html
>
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
