Why don't we use the Wiki page to list our *specific* "gotchas" we encounter and try to come up with a solution for them. My guess is that we can do so.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > I would like to see what the major issues are as to why people are > rejecting model/component generics. None that I have seen so far are > that convincing- especially the complaints of verbosity. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of James Carman > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 10:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on > generics with Wicket > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> I'm not sure I like where this discussion is going. I don't see anyone > >> having any particular objections against current state. I think before > >> we even think of (partially) reverting generics we have to discuss >> what's wrong (except the verbosity of course, but that's not something > >> we can really do about) with current state. I use wicket with generics > >> daily and I don't see any particular show stopper so far. >> > > +1, I agree. I think this discussion might be counter-productive if > folks who aren't using the generified versions are voting. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
