I thought Matt Raible had some success with getting GWT to play nice with
Maven:

http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/modularizing_gwt_applications_with_gwt

Personally I would choose GWT only when I want to keep server calls to a
bare minimum.  "Ready made" components and all may look enticing, but in my
experience you always fall into the trap where they do *almost* what you
want but not *exactly* (just like JSF).

In theory nothing stops somone from writing components as "rich looking" as
ExtJS.  I think Matej's "inmethod grid" is a good example.

P.S. people say my article is "one sided" but no-one can explain *why ;) -
ok, ok this has been discussed to death in the comments there ...

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Brill Pappin <br...@pappin.ca> wrote:

> Yah, its a pitty, but the Google guys are pretty down on Maven.
>
> I once asked them to look into making it more maven friendly, and got
> throughly blasted.
> if I remember correctly the comment from one of the GWT developers was
> something along the lines of "we don't want to waste our time with garbage
> like maven".
> I didn't bother to argue about it, because if you know maven and like it,
> you know why its advantageous, and if your that set against it it won't
> matter what others say.
>
> However there are a few maven plugins for it, and combined with the war
> overlay feature, it not to hard to get it all working and integrate with
> other projects.
>
> - Brill Pappin
>
>
> On 8-Apr-09, at 10:46 AM, Casper Bang wrote:
>
>  Peter Thomas did a great side by side you should checkout:
>>>
>>
>> Good article, if perhaps a bit one-sided. I can understand how
>> separation-of-concerns/composability comes slightly more natural to
>> Wicket.
>> However the performance, flexibility and component repertoire of GWT along
>> with steadily more capable browsers leaves me with a feeling that "I'll
>> get
>> more bang for my buck".
>>
>>  Until GWT has a build system that is better I'll stay away from it.
>>>
>> Since version 1.6 today, it uses normal Ant scripts (which I suppose is
>> easy
>> to mavenize).
>>
>> Thanks guys,
>>
>> /Casper
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to