Of course, but the goal of using a framework like Wicket is just that: avoid having to write everything by myself. No?
So it is a suggestion to add in a future release. I think a lot of people need that kind of functionality. If it could be generic enough. I think Ajax is rarely used to submit a form. It is more to make it dynamic. Like adapting the form content based on other fields values. I can see tons of examples for that. It would be very nice to be able to do that kind of stuff without having to rewrite part of the code ourselves. I I find time to write it myself I will be glad to give my code to the Wicket team... Thierry On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 15:40, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > you can see how the submit behavior does it and replicate the parts > you need. all these things are not using some magical internal apis. > you are meant to build your own things when the default > implementations do not do what you want. > > -igor > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Leveque<tleve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, but I was not talking about using the submit behavior. > > > > I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the > value > > of multiple form fields. > > > > I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I > encounter > > this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but this time I am > stuck. > > There should be a simple way to create an ajax behavior that will send > the > > values from the form components we want. Maybe with the option to > validate > > them or not. > > What do you think? > > > > Thierry > > > > > > 2009/7/7 Stefan Malmesjö <s.m.mo...@gmail.com> > > > >> I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at > >> least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on > a > >> textfield that is required, I don't really know. > >> > >> Maybe that path is too complicated. > >> > >> /Stefan > >> > >> On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote: > >> > >>> Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form > has > >>> been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work? > >>> > >>> /Stefan > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleve...@gmail.com > <mailto: > >>> tleve...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Any following on that? > >>> > >>> Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote > >>> your own > >>> behavior? > >>> > >>> I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick > >>> way to > >>> solve my problem. > >>> > >>> Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax > >>> behavior? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Thierry > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg > >>> <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com <mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use > >>> > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) > >>> > > >>> > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple > >>> > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents > to > >>> > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access > >>> to the > >>> > raw values. > >>> > > >>> > -igor > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez > >>> > <dfernan...@users.sourceforge.net > >>> <mailto:dfernan...@users.sourceforge.net>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I > >>> would really > >>> > need > >>> > > type conversion in this case. > >>> > > > >>> > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: > >>> > > > >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| > >>> > > > >>> > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | > >>> > > > >>> > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and > >>> INPUT2 two > >>> > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and > >>> INPUT2 are > >>> > > required (when they are visible, of course). > >>> > > > >>> > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, > >>> hiding INPUT1 > >>> > and > >>> > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have > >>> the same > >>> > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: > >>> > > > >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| > >>> > > > >>> > > |INPUT3="aBc" | > >>> > > > >>> > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read > >>> the value > >>> > from > >>> > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will > >>> receive a > >>> > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it > >>> is, but I > >>> > just > >>> > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit > >>> the form, and > >>> > > not now that I am only changing the operator. > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks. > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards, > >>> > > Daniel. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot > >>> access > >>> > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also > >>> planning > >>> > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? > >>> > >> > >>> > >> -igor > >>> > >> > >>> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernan...@users.sourceforge.net > >>> <mailto:dfernan...@users.sourceforge.net>>: > >>> > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" > >>> event I want > >>> > to > >>> > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from > >>> other fields > >>> > of > >>> > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the > >>> > >>> DropDownChoice. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from > >>> the other > >>> > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other > >>> components... > >>> > but > >>> > >>> the > >>> > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the > >>> form data, > >>> > but > >>> > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want > validation > >>> > messages > >>> > >>> to > >>> > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just > >>> > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything > >>> like that in > >>> > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Is there a way to do this? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Daniel. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>> <mailto:users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org> > >>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>> <mailto:users-h...@wicket.apache.org> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > View this message in context: > >>> > > >>> > >>> > http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html > >>> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>> <mailto:users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org> > >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>> <mailto:users-h...@wicket.apache.org> > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>> <mailto:users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org> > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>> <mailto:users-h...@wicket.apache.org> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
