On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel <cmen...@wicketbuch.de> wrote: > > That's exactly my point :-) > > This is not a good example to allow queuing, because there's no gain. > Either there is an important difference between the two forms, then it > doesn't make sense to queue *above* the forms, or there is no > difference between the forms, then you can just have *one* form and not > need queue at all. > > By "needs to be done in code" I mean that it is not something that > should be doable in markup. >
Again, the main point I was making is that with queuing, it is possible that the markup can be used to change behavior. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
