it is not. I'm hacking on the trunk to make that work. Maybe a quick solution is just change org.apache.wicket to org.apache.wicket.core in the -core bundle.
Of course there are some default scope classes that works through different packages but I can just make them public for now. On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:18 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Daniele Dellafiore <ilde...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I think that the wicket package layout should be changed now that -util > and > > -request bundles have been detached from -core. > > > > From an OSGi perspective, we should probably try to make sure that > packages don't span jar files. Everything in > org.apache,wicket.request should be in wicket-request.jar, for > example. I don't know if that's the case, currently or not. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
