Am 04.02.2013 15:43, schrieb manuelbarzi:
Play Framework, Apache Click, Stripes, Struts, JSF, Seam
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=%22Play+Framework%22%2C+%22Apache+Click%22%2C+Stripes%2C+Struts%2C+JSF%2C+Seam
What needs to be improved to get a wider adoption of Wicket ?
IMO, "selling" Wicket as Vaadin does, may help a lot.
I think, you should not compare wicket with vaadin. Wicket is not the
right answer for every project. Wicket does not compete with vaadin,
because wicket is a different hammer. The rise of "javascript apps"
could change the future of web development, but for such a project you
should not use wicket either. IMHO wicket is the better answer than
struts, grails (if you have a long term maintenance cycle), jsf...
I think there are many wicket projects out there, but wicket is not the
so called cool stuff like grails, spring roo and so on... nothing a
developer likes to play with (which is IMHO a good thing). I think, this
could be changed with wicket 6 (jquery build-in)... but it is a long way.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
