Actually you can :) But you need CSS tables for this :) On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:53, nino martinez wael < [email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Maxim, but I do not know the side effects, im going to try > it.. As it is now (out of the box), we cannot have nested forms in tables > (for example on form per <tr>) without breaking html. > > -Nino > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I would say we can create overridable method so users can specify which > tag > > to use > > it will help with `<tr>` > > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 01:39, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think we could improve nested Forms so that only <form> tags are > > > turned into a <div>, but anything else stays as it is. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > Sven > > > > > > Am 23.04.19 um 10:01 schrieb nino martinez wael: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > When nesting forms, the form tag are changed to an div and it is hard > > > coded: > > > > org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:1597 > > > > ... > > > > > > > > tag.setName("div"); > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > If only I could change the tag to be tr, it would produce valid html. > > Are > > > > it deliberate to be hardcoded? > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > -- > Best regards / Med venlig hilsen > Nino Martinez > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
