Actually you can :)
But you need CSS tables for this :)
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:53, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Maxim, but I do not know the side effects, im going to try
> it.. As it is now (out of the box), we cannot have nested forms in tables
> (for example on form per <tr>) without breaking html.
>
> -Nino
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would say we can create overridable method so users can specify which
> tag
> > to use
> > it will help with `<tr>`
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 01:39, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think we could improve nested Forms so that only <form> tags are
> > > turned into a <div>, but anything else stays as it is.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > > Sven
> > >
> > > Am 23.04.19 um 10:01 schrieb nino martinez wael:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > When nesting forms, the form tag are changed to an div and it is hard
> > > coded:
> > > > org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:1597
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > tag.setName("div");
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > If only I could change the tag to be tr, it would produce valid html.
> > Are
> > > > it deliberate to be hardcoded?
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> Nino Martinez
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
