if its CSS its not a table right?
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:25 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Actually you can :)
> But you need CSS tables for this :)
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:53, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree with Maxim, but I do not know the side effects, im going to try
> > it.. As it is now (out of the box), we cannot have nested forms in tables
> > (for example on form per <tr>) without breaking html.
> >
> > -Nino
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would say we can create overridable method so users can specify which
> > tag
> > > to use
> > > it will help with `<tr>`
> > >
> > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 01:39, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I think we could improve nested Forms so that only <form> tags are
> > > > turned into a <div>, but anything else stays as it is.
> > > >
> > > > WDYT?
> > > > Sven
> > > >
> > > > Am 23.04.19 um 10:01 schrieb nino martinez wael:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > When nesting forms, the form tag are changed to an div and it is
> hard
> > > > coded:
> > > > > org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:1597
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > tag.setName("div");
> > > > >
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > If only I could change the tag to be tr, it would produce valid
> html.
> > > Are
> > > > > it deliberate to be hardcoded?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> > Nino Martinez
> >
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
Nino Martinez
