until next version comes out, this lump of code seems to be working:

Form<Action> actionForm=new Form<>("actionForm"){
    @Override
    protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
        super.onComponentTag(tag);
        tag.setName("tr");
    }
}
;


On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:28 AM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Nino,
>
>
>
> I've taken the liberty of improving this with WICKET-6658:
>
> No need to let Form enforce a  <form>-tag when it's changed into a div
> afterwards (in case of nested forms).
>
>
>
> Have fun
>
> Sven
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On 24.04.2019 at 08:45,  <nino martinez wael>  wrote:
> >
> >
> >  normally I would agree.. But when our designer gives us the html, and
> there are tables in it we need to change that stuff.. I do not like the
> idea that the web framework forces you to change markup so that it can
> work.. One thing are to teach the devs that there are some quirks with the
> web framework (thats completely expected). But to have to teach the
> designer about a web framework so they can avoid the quirky parts seems
> wrong. Its not part of Wickets statement anyhow.  >  Just Java  &  HTML  >
>  >  Leverage what you know about Java or your favourite HTML editor to
> write  >  Wicket applications. With pure Java code and HTML markup Wicket
> is the  >  go-to web framework for purists.  >  /rant off :) On Wed, Apr
> 24, 2019 at 8:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote:  >  if something "look like a
> duck, walk like a duck and sound like a duck" -  >  it is duck :)  >  CSS
> table are tables, but with no HTML '' tags :)  >   >  On Wed, 24 Apr 2019
> at 13:22, nino martinez wael  <   >  nino.martinez.
> w...@gmail.com>  wrote:  >   >   >  if its CSS its not a table right?  >
>  >   >   >   >   >   >   >  On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:25 AM Maxim
> Solodovnik  >   >  wrote:  >   >   >   >   >  Actually you can :)  >   >
>  >  But you need CSS tables for this :)  >   >   >   >   >   >  On Wed, 24
> Apr 2019 at 11:53, nino martinez wael  <   >   >   >
> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com>  wrote:  >   >   >   >   >   >   >  I agree
> with Maxim, but I do not know the side effects, im going to  >  try  >   >
>  >   >  it.. As it is now (out of the box), we cannot have nested forms in
> >   >  tables  >   >   >   >  (for example on form per ) without breaking
> html.  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  -Nino  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik  <   >
> solomax...@gmail.com  >   >   >   >   >   >   >  wrote:  >   >   >   >
>  >   >   >   >   >  I would say we can create overridable method so users
> can specify  >   >  which  >   >   >   >  tag  >   >   >   >   >  to use  >
>   >   >   >   >  it will help with ``  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >  On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 01:39, Sven Meier wrote:  >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >   >   >   >   >  Hi,  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  I
> think we could improve nested Forms so that only
> >
> >  tags  >  are  >   >   >   >   >   >  turned into a
> >
> > , but anything else stays as it is.  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >   >   >  WDYT?  >   >   >   >   >   >  Sven  >   >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >   >   >   >   >  Am 23.04.19 um 10:01 schrieb nino martinez wael:  >
>  >   >   >   >   >   >  Hi  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >   >  When nesting forms, the form tag are changed to an div and it  >
> is  >   >   >  hard  >   >   >   >   >   >  coded:  >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >  org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:1597  >   >   >   >   >
>  >   >  ...  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
> tag.setName("div");  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
> ...  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  If only I could
> change the tag to be tr, it would produce valid  >   >   >  html.  >   >
>  >   >   >  Are  >   >   >   >   >   >   >  it deliberate to be hardcoded?
> >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >   >  -------------------------
> --------------------------------------------  >   >   >   >   >   >  To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org  >   >   >   >
>  >   >  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org  >
>  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >
>  >   >  --  >   >   >   >   >  WBR  >   >   >   >   >  Maxim aka solomax
> >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  --  >
>  >   >   >  Best regards / Med venlig hilsen  >   >   >   >  Nino Martinez
> >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  --  >   >   >  WBR  >
>  >   >  Maxim aka solomax  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  --  >   >
> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen  >   >  Nino Martinez  >   >   >   >   >
> --  >  WBR  >  Maxim aka solomax  >  -- Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> Nino Martinez
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
Nino Martinez

Reply via email to