On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 23:09, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> > wrote: > >> >> On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think this initiative is great and will help improved our UX. >>> The paper cut issues could be great for anyone wanting to start >>> participating in open source and want a small bug to fix (like GSOC >>> students >>> :p ) >>> >>> Related jira issues could be just linked to this jira task. >>>> >>> >>> Instead of linking them we could tag them with paperCut, maybe we >>> like this >>> approach better. >>> >>> User could tag the issues with paperCut and developers should rate >>> the >>> issue's difficulty and priority. >> >> I don't see the difference between a "papercut" tag and the "trivial" >> difficulty. Could you explain? >> >> > The idea is that if it's a user submitted issue, the user might not > know the > difficulty of the issue and he will just mark it with the tag.
How can he tag with papercut if he doesn't know if it's a trivial issue (since the definition of a paper cut is that it's a trivial issue)! :) > If the > developer comes and marks it difficult, we still know that the user > though > that the issue needed attention and raises an usability problem. I don't think papercut == usability issue. For usability issues we should tag them with "usability" IMO since the need is more general than just for papercuts. Thanks -Vincent >>> Regarding >>> >>>> Trivial: >>>> >> http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10534 >>>> >>> we are targeting just the issues in the CORE? there are lots of >>> trivial >>> issues in other components. >> >> See my previous mail. I mentioned the need to have the difficulty >> custom field in other jira projects too... >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
