On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Raluca Stavro <raluca.moro...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Raluca Stavro <raluca.moro...@xwiki.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Ecaterina Valica <vali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 13:46, Denis Gervalle <d...@softec.lu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:19, Ecaterina Valica <vali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:01, Denis Gervalle <d...@softec.lu> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 17:00, Ecaterina Valica <vali...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > > It will if it display the inheritance source in a column. For right
>>>> > set
>>>> > > > at
>>>> > > > > current level this column could even precise what inheritance has
>>>> > been
>>>> > > > > overwritten, both in terms of allowance and origin.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Denis.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Hi Denis,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > "Something" like this:
>>>> > > >
>>>> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > > Yes, "something" like that. I would have expected a "back to basic"
>>>> > button
>>>> > > in place of "advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid
>>>> > > duplicating basic rights. Maybe the menu should be horizontal in the
>>>> > > advanced interface, I do not know. Also add some hyperlinks to upper
>>>> > level
>>>> > > in the column explaining inheritance. And put the highlight of changes
>>>> > over
>>>> > > the rest of the row (includes name and inheritance)
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space
>>>> >
>>>> > About:
>>>> >
>>>> > > I would have expected a "back to basic" button
>>>> > > in place of "advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid
>>>> > > duplicating basic rights
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/rights52Space.png
>>>> >
>>>> > This removal of the basic interface will be set from the user profile's
>>>> > variables (if it has advanced type)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, just removed when the advanced interface is shown using the advanced
>>>> button, like you have done.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > I mean if the user is advanced, all the
>>>> > rows will be presented in advances?
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> No, the only thing I proposed is that user that are not set "Advanced user"
>>>> in their profile, will not be presented the advanced interface link, and
>>>> will never see extended rights.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > I'm asking because I think the collapsed view is great to see changes up
>>>> in
>>>> > the table, where you don't care the advanced status of those rights.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> I completely agree. Advanced interface is for understanding and fixing deep
>>>> complex stuffs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > WDYT ? Is this interesting ?
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > it's nice :P I would love to see some other opinions.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Yes, could it be possible for you to fix the interactive version to hide
>>>> the
>>>> basics and also to have hover and click work as expected. I think it will
>>>> helps in receiving more feed back with causing confusion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Raluca offered to help me fix the interaction.
>>
>> I fixed some interaction issues. There are more to do, but I think
>> that this is enough for now. We will implement it right if this
>> proposal will be accepted/voted.
>> I tested the interaction only on FF 3.6.3.
>>
>> Raluca.
>>
>
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Spac

(Wrong copy-paste)

http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space

Raluca.
>
> Raluca.
>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I found the result really well suited now. There is just some improvement
>>>> in
>>>> color contrast, icons aspect, and so on that should be applied if we get
>>>> approval for this proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Once you have fixed the sample, I think that a summary page (resume of our
>>>> reflexion, and containing only the final proposal) and than a vote thread
>>>> could be appropriate to receive feedback from other committers, since the
>>>> size of this thread could be pushing back.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, a summary+vote is needed.
>>>
>>> I made a version with pagination and filters added.
>>> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space
>>>
>>> PNG for the filters:
>>> collapsed:
>>> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/filtersCollapsed.png
>>> expanded:
>>> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/filtersExpanded.png
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>> Could this filters be helpful? Are too powerful/complex/useless?
>>>
>>> From an implementation point of view, can a livetable have more than one
>>> filter per a column. Anyway this will be a custom livetable, because we also
>>> need to integrate the "add user" part and the "save/reset" buttons.
>>>
>>> Also, from an implementation point of view, should we enable multiselect
>>> (ex. to select multiple rights)?
>>>
>>> Obs. Right -> Sources -> Implicit refer to the rights that come from the
>>> setting of another right (example: admin means implicit
>>> view+edit+delete+comment; creator means implicit delete). Would this filter
>>> option be useful or it is too much?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Caty
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Caty
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > users mailing list
>>>> > users@xwiki.org
>>>> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Denis Gervalle
>>>> SOFTEC sa - CEO
>>>> eGuilde sarl - CTO
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devs mailing list
>>>> d...@xwiki.org
>>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devs mailing list
>>> d...@xwiki.org
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to