There are two purposes of interpreter binding. One is what you mentioned and another one is to manage a default interpreter. If we provide a new way to set default interpreter, I think we can remove them :-) We could set permissions in other ways.
Overall, +1 On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I raise this thread to discuss whether we need the interpreter binding. > Currently when user create notes, they have to bind interpreters to their > notes in note page. Otherwise they will hit interpreter not found issue. > Besides that in zeppelin server side, we maintain the interpreter binding > info in memory as well as in interpreter.json. > > IMHO, it is not necessary to do interpreter binding. Because it just add > extra burden to maintain the interpreter binding info in zeppelin server > side, and doesn't introduce any benefits. The only benefit is that we will > check whether user have permission to use this interpreter, but actually > zeppelin will check the permission when running paragraph, so I don't think > we need to introduce interpreter binding just for this kind of permission > check that we will do later. > > So overall, I would suggest to remove interpreter binding feature. What > do you think ? > -- 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 http://madeng.net
