I'll report back if I'm successful with the approach I've mentioned. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:51 AM, RJ Nowling <rnowl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A search of the user list suggests that Zeppelin can support a separate > SparkContext for each notebook but the user who tried it ran into issues. > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I haven't done this myself but was recently starting to do research on >> doing this. Perhaps this blog post may be of help: >> http://nginx.com/blog/websocket-nginx/ ? >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:24 AM Silvio Fiorito < >> silvio.fior...@granturing.com> wrote: >> >>> I haven’t tried this myself yet but something I’ve been thinking as >>> well. Will the nginx reverse proxy support web sockets as well? >>> >>> Ideally we’d have isolated SparkContexts so users aren’t trampling >>> over each other. Honestly I think it’d be good to have the option of >>> starting a new SparkContext per notebook as well or using the model >>> Databricks has where you “attach” a notebook to a cluster. >>> >>> From: RJ Nowling >>> Reply-To: "users@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org" >>> Date: Friday, March 27, 2015 at 12:19 PM >>> To: "users@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org" >>> Subject: Multi-user approach >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm looking into ways to support multiple users with Zeppelin. I want >>> to provide isolation between users. >>> >>> I'm considering the following approach: >>> * Run Zeppelin under each user's account with its own set of ports >>> * Use nginx as a reverse proxy for providing authentication >>> >>> Has anyone done anything similar? Any better alternatives? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> RJ >>> >> >
