Weird! At http://www.bahn.com/i/view/DEU/en/trains/overview/ice.shtml, the same train is shown at 320 km/h. I can only assume as you suggest that this particular page (and not the whole of the English language Bahn website) caters purely to the ignorant Brits. Certainly all their other English language web pages use the correct km/h.
I too will write to them and point out their error. John F-L ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Vlietstra To: U.S. Metric Association Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 12:21 PM Subject: [USMA:49381] RE: High speed rail error The site that I was commenting about was http://www.bahn.com/i/view/GBR/en/about/overview/ice-in-london.shtml which quotes speeds of up to 320 kph[sic] between London and Cologne. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of John Frewen-Lord Sent: 01 January 2011 12:03 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:49380] RE: High speed rail error On Bahn's website at http://www.bahn.com/i/view/DEU/en/trains/overview/ecic.shtml, which is in English, the speed of the trains described is shown as 200 km/h. John F-L ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Vlietstra To: U.S. Metric Association Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 10:42 AM Subject: [USMA:49374] RE: High speed rail error I recently sent an e-mail to the Bundesbahn asking why they used the term "kph" rather than "km/h" on their English-language website. It appears that they are pandering to the lowest level of British intelligence. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of Pat Naughtin Sent: 01 January 2011 00:36 To: U.S. Metric Association Cc: USMA Metric Association Subject: [USMA:49368] High speed rail error Dear Carleton, I think you will be interested in this train story at http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/12/hsr-emissions-paper-was-wrong/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=hsr-emissions-paper-was-wrong where they say: Berkeley's numbers are undone by a simple unit conversion error committed by a CHSRA consultant. Conversions between metric and imperial units are prone to errors and misunderstandings, most famously in the case of NASA's $300 million Mars Climate Orbiter mission, which was inadvertently crashed into Mars because of an overlooked conversion between pounds and Newtons. In the case of the high-speed rail study, the CHSRA consultant's unit conversion error leads to an overestimate of HSR energy consumption by a factor of nearly four-not just in the Berkeley study, but also in the CHSRA's program level environmental reports. The energy consumption figure cited in the Berkeley study and its supplementary data is 170 kilowatt-hours per vehicle kilometer traveled, or kWh/VKT, a measure of how much energy a high-speed train consumes on average when traveling one kilometer. This number is correctly converted by Berkeley from a figure of 924,384 BTU/VMT referenced in the energy chapter of the 2008 CHSRA program-level EIR. That chapter in turn references a peer-review study performed for CHSRA by the German firm DE-Consult in 2000, which evaluated the energy consumption of a hypothetical 16-car trainset with a seating capacity of 1200 and a design speed of 385 km/h (240 mph) and an operating speed of 350 km/h (220 mph), essentially a souped-up German ICE3. The DE-Consult study (unavailable online) contains detailed performance simulations for the proposed California system that give the average energy consumption of such a train as 74.2 kWh/VMT, or 46 kWh/VKT (see copy of Annex 4-11). And therein lies the error: CHSRA's consultant botched the conversion from kilowatt-hours to British Thermal Units, feeding Berkeley a figure of 170 kWh/VKT instead of 46 kWh/VKT. I wonder why they were converting from British Thermal Units (no temperature specified) to kilowatt hours instead of (say) megajoules per kilometre (MJ/km). Clearly none of the consultant engineers has any sort of firm grasp on metrology -- VKT for vehicle kilometre travelled doesn't impress me as coming from a knowledgeable person who knows his SI from his toothbrush. Cheers, Pat Naughtin LCAMS Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY PO Box 305 Belmont 3216, Geelong, Australia Phone: 61 3 5241 2008 Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat at pat.naugh...@metricationmatters.com or to get the free 'Metrication matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.
