On 02/24/2018 04:27 PM, Piotr Krysik via USRP-users wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Ad.A I doubted it as the time reported by both USRPs at the end of
synchronization function is about ~0.005 s. Anyway I increased the value
of start time to 9 seconds - with the same (negative) result.
Ad.B When I get these B210s to time-synchronize I plan to implement
phase calibration method that doesn't rely on the capabilities provided
by B210's LO synthesizer. But I need to get to that point first. BTW
180deg ambiguity is still better than what I expected.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Krysik
What if you use the time-stamps on the streams to time-align, and THEN
cross-correlate?
Remember that multi-usrp does this as a first step when it's dealing
with multiple notionally-time-aligned streams from multiple devices.
But that's only *WITHIN* a single multi-usrp object, and you necessarily
have more than one multi_usrp object.
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
