Since you phrased your message as a question, I will answer. I don't know. But what the draft says also does not align with your last check.
thanks, Rob On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:52 PM Corey Bonnell <corey.bonn...@digicert.com> wrote: > Is there actually uniform “browser behavior” today across major browsers > regarding alignment with WHATWG guidance for IDNA2008? Last I checked (a > few months ago), Firefox and Safari implement non-transitional IDNA2008, > whereas Chrome is still using UTS-46 transitional processing. > > > > Thanks, > > Corey > > > > *From:* Uta <uta-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Rob Sayre > *Sent:* Thursday, January 26, 2023 2:55 PM > *To:* Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im>; uta@ietf.org > *Subject:* [Uta] Browser behavior in draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis > > > > Hi, > > > > I just filed an issue* to track treatment of browser behavior and WHATWG > specs in > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-10.html > > > > It's probably easier to track that way, whatever the resolution might be. > > > > thanks, > > Rob > > > > * https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/issues/85 >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
