On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 2:26 PM John C Klensin <john-i...@jck.com> wrote:
> > That is clearly kicking the can down the road, but, until the > now-closed I18n Directorate comes up with carefully developed > recommendations about how to use IDNs when either standard might > be assumed > The biggest value any internet standards organization provides is a global namespace. We have to get that part right. I agree that the discussion can be tiresome, but saying "IDNA2008" is the standard is not correct. We have to document the current practice, but that doesn't mean there was anything wrong with IDNA2008 at the time. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
