On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 3:43 PM Vint Cerf <v...@google.com> wrote: > we must have different metrics of "success" >
The predictable result here will be UTS46-only names, right? It's like arguing with a teenager. I know the WHATWG folks pretty well. thanks, Rob > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 6:31 PM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 3:18 PM Vint Cerf <v...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> It seems to me that UTS#46 torpedoed, deliberately, the two year >>> attempt in IDNA2008 to curb some clear problems with IDNA2003. >>> >> >> Yes, but so what? I don't care if it was deliberate, and I 100% don't >> care about the standards politics. Users don't either. >> >> What matters is whether it was successful. It was written by two people >> at Google and Microsoft who presumably weren't writing it for fun, and it >> seems like it works. >> >> thanks, >> Rob >> >> > > -- > Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to: > Vint Cerf > Google, LLC > 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor > Reston, VA 20190 > +1 (571) 213 1346 > > > until further notice > > > >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
